71 thoughts on “Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity | Lecture 1

  1. will one of thouse Prof. only one write his information in a writable clear form. His interpretation and table are so drty.

  2. Yes, I agree WITH YOU that the Earth is FLAT and that 13 MILLION SUNS are revolving it!!! BUT I"S REALLY HOT HERE (152,13 Celcius degrees in my flat now) AND BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE POWER to reduce the number of suns to about 3.14, PLEASE DO IT!!! Ps1.How many miles do you do during the lecture?You are really a handsome man because you're NOT fat!!!Ps2.I don't like men with long, DARK hairs on theirs VERY wise faces, I prefer hansome, young/old, BLACK/GREEN/ORANGE (like Mr Trump, my favorite) men with NO hairs on theirs heads AT ALL!!!They f*ck really good.God bless me because I am dying together with my beloved planet!!!MAKE THE PLANET GREAT AGAING!!!!!!Ps3.But my favorite Mr Trump should, of course, go with Mr Musk to the Mars to colonize it, to build next millions Trump Towers (all golden inside and outside, and also with golden lawns around them) AND THEN DESTROY THE MARS, like very reach, highly inteligent billioners are doing it with the Earth!!!CIAO!!!Tomorrow I'm going on vacations on Pluton, it's much cooler there.

  3. Ps4.I would LOVE to be on Mrs Trump place.I would have to do NOTHING AT ALL TO BE FAMOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Like UNNATURAL MONSTERS: THE CARDASHIANS and their followers: DUCK-like lips, hips, asses, cheeks, cheasts and EVERYTHING FULL OF SILICON AND BOTOX INCLUDING THEIR BRAINS!!!And of course their poussies BOLD AND BEAUTIFUL like 5-year-old-little-girl ones.MAKE NATURAL POUSSIES GREAT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. Thank you Mr. Susskind, The subject is very difficult but your approach is very welcome. I can follow what you're explaining. I learned this subject years ago but had some areas that left me a bit confused. Your explanation is better for me to follow. So thank You very much.

  5. Einstein was a thief, a plagiarist. Susskind: I always forget which law is which. Hmmm?
    Anslem's ontological argument for God. Don't forget.

  6. THE ULTIMATE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN:

    The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential in what is the ultimate UNIFICATION of physics/physical experience. It is a very great law of physics that the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.

    The SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. This is a very great truth in physics. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, and includes opposites.

    Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. THINK about it ALL. Piece it all together. We always begin with typical, common, or ordinary experience when establishing physical fundamentals or laws. Importantly, more explains more in physics; AND less explains less.

    The additional (fourth) spatial dimension is known to mathematically unify Einstein's equations (regarding gravity) with Maxwell's equations (as they describe electromagnetism). ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, and describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Now, consider what is invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. EXCELLENT. So, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED IN AND OUT of SPACE AND TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Magnificent.

    A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.

    Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Now, get a good LOOK at what is the black space of THE EYE. GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is contracting OR expanding IN AND WITH TIME. F=ma AND E=mc2 CLEARLY PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Moreover, time dilation also ULTIMATELY proves that GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Galaxies are basically FLAT, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The birth AND death of stars is thus basically visible AND understood. Stellar clustering ALSO proves that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Clearly, the supergiant stars prove that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Stars as closer together AND farther apart make galaxies much better understood. GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This also explains the cosmological redshift AND the "black hole(s)". "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Absolutely ingenious !!! POINTS are points. I have explained why HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY.

    Dream experience is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Dream experience is/involves true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the genius of dreams. MOST IMPORTANTLY, in dreams, BODILY/VISUAL experience is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE. (THE EYE is ALSO the body.) Dream experience is CLEARLY that of the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE. Great !!! Dream experience GROWS/INCREASES.

    "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. F=ma AND E=mc2 prove that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THEREFORE, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky; AND objects fall at the SAME RATE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. THINK about it. GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. GREAT !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.

    THE PLANETS are not "falling" in "curved SPACE" in RELATION to what is THE SUN. This is nonsense. The rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. THEREFORE, it is PROVEN that gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. F=ma and E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY.

    By Frank DiMeglio

  7. loool.. you guys really think a retarded plumber without any degree could teach you anything about physics?
    oh well – ofcourse he can teach you about theoretical – never proven – mathematical constructs like einsteins theory of relativity.

  8. I have 15 Yeats and ist not complicated undestad integrales of this video and this topic

  9. At 25 minutes, Susskind (unknowingly) demonstrates that the cult of Relativity (and possibly Quantum theory) is woefully lacking for understanding our Universe. So wrong it's not even wrong …

  10. Prof Susskind is older then Christopher Walken, so it is in fact Walken who sound like Susskind. And any ways, who cares about what is voice sound like, are you not here to learn physic? Or it's because you have no idea of what he talks about and still want to feel smart, so you show that you have some general culture?

    The sound of his voice is irrelevant, the subject is what really matter.

    Finally, commenting is an option, not an obligation.

  11. As a Professor, He says, "I don't know" and "I can't remember" a lot. I'd suggest finding a different professor or university.

  12. LOOK TO WHAT TESLA SAID ABOUT RELATIVITY. LOOK TO TESLA'S DYNAMIC THEORY OF GRAVITY.. GRAVITY IS THE EQUAL AND OPPOSITE AFFECT OF EMF. ONE OF THESE TWO MEN IS WRONG GUESS WHICH ONE IS CORRECT?.

  13. Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity leads us to anti gravity. Gravity is the equal and opposite reaction to EMF. I knew Einstein was wrong the first time I read it. HIDING US FROM THE TRUTH. They will never mention the greatest inventor in history at this college. Tesla 600 patents that all worked , Einstein 0

  14. Einstein's theory does not describe the periodic features of the planetary distances of the Solar system.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtlvdYTPj-Y

  15. Eisenberg says that the general of reality of gravity is thru mass of energy generating plasma which is fire static and so on that gravity is created thru moving in circles and that Albert einstein is wrong because he looks funny …… it is done thru a particle know as dimensional quark it is invisible but matter manifested it thru sand carbon and tetrahedron shapes that is how you open warm holes when infinite speed happens. Colliding these particles open gate ways to a open magnetic field that static is common with . Everytime you move particles are manifested all together to form Matter of movement. So gravity happen thru energy

  16. He should grow the beard longer the motion of a particle depends on mass, attraction, quantity and likeness.?

  17. Great lecturer, but boy those interminable questions from the audience really slowed things down to the point where I had to give up.

  18. Gravity, stated st the beginning of the video/lecture. I almost laughed as it reminded me of the Desertphile clip.

  19. so while falling in a gravitational field, you dont feel ''funny'' because of the free fall, you feel ''funny'' because you're not used to experience the Radial Vector the X component, which is in fact, the first and second derivative of the Y Coordinate with respect to time .

    Got it. now lets learn Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, that should be easy…

  20. Most of the questions were silly, and things you should know before having seen this lecture. Clearly these students have taken up to vector calculus, and multiple physics courses. Questions like why the force of gravity is negative, or how the length of a vector in a vector field relates to the strength of the field at that point annoyed me since they’re fundamental concepts of topics you’d learn in the prerequisite courses before this class XD

    tldr: their questions were about things they should already know/ are somewhat obvious

    thanks to the YouTube sorting algorithm to recommending me this video lol

  21. The response of Susskind to the question at 29:26 is as wrong as the myth about the falling apple. The fact is that this 'guess' was communicated privately to Newton by Robert Hooke. The role of Newton was in the proof of this guess using the Kepler laws.

  22. No matter how much I listen to L.S. , I feel like I learn nothing. Am sure there is something there, but it is so slow moving (with interludes) I think my short term memory zonks out. Did he actually talk about relativity here?

  23. Why did I major in Economics when I knew I was good at math? I worked in finance for a couple years, played piano professionally for a couple years and spent the last couple years selling mortgages, working side jobs and brushing up on physics and math hoping to go back for a physics degree. There are so many interesting intellectual pursuits. How does one pick one and go with it- especially right out of high school. People's interests change! At least mine do. All the time! With YouTube I mean Jesus, education is at our fingertips. I know I must have a couple screws loose but I don't know how to live. I'm 33 and I don't wanna be an analyst lol.

  24. I have a stupid question about : Einstein's famous equation. Is it an approximate? Does it supposedly account for all energy converted. If we have two samples of equal mass, however one has a large number of single bonds between the atoms and the other has triple bonds.Shouldn't then the triple bond mass have more energy than the other mass? ME…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *